Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.8 to 8.4, and Grok 4.5 costs 1.7x less per output token ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
2
Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
10
vs boards won of 12 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Grok 4.5: which to pick

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI) or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
12
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
12
Grok 4.5 only
112
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 91.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3% against Grok 4.5 97.8%, 91.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Grok 4.5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Grok 4.5 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsGrok 4.5Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning12
Math01
Knowledge14
All shared boards210
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured94.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1553Only Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.4Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%87.3%Grok 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured36.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured55.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured42.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%46.4%Grok 4.5
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1309.3Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1474Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1471Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1556Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1567Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1562Only Grok 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured6.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.438.8Grok 4.5
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Grok 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured41.2Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1218Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1249Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1220Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1236Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1229Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1236Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1155Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1209Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured85.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured44.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured24.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured52.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured6.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured56.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured23.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$3,887Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1216Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
GPQA Diamond53.8%92.9%Grok 4.5
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%61.8%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured93.1%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.7%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%93.4%Grok 4.5
ARC-AGINot measured87.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured52.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured35.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1462Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1465Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1464Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1304Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured83.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%97.8%Grok 4.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured57.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured24.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1460Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Grok 4.5 measured
MathArenaNot measured34.1%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
MMLU Pro72.6%89.2%Grok 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%86.0%Grok 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%67.4%Grok 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%71.7%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%61.8%Grok 4.5
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured48.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1464Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1440Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1463Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1441Only Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured50.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1281Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1277Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1263Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1266Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1257Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1275Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1214Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1257Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.1%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured73.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured63.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
DTBenchNot measured96.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMCANot measured45.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured74.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured22.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1448Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1445Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1442Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1287Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1453Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1440Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1495Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1448Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1430Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1406Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1457Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1451Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1449Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1456Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1445Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1434Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1285Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1345Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1293Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1276Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1293Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1452Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.5
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)SpaceXAI Grok 4.5
MakerOpenAIxAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024July 8, 2026
Context window128K500K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.6
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.62
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Grok 4.5 for coding?

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI) or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Grok 4.5?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Grok 4.5 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.5's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next