Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.7, and Muse Spark 1.1 costs 2.4x less per output token ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
42
vs boards won of 42 shared

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
42
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
16
Muse Spark 1.1 only
62
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 36.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: Chinese: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 1009 against Muse Spark 1.1 1348, 56.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge010
General020
All shared boards042
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: coding12831498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12781498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.733.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1134Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%86.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleBench17.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles6.0%34.0%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts12641485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert12411478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME14.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math12851482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12831487Muse Spark 1.1
MathArenaNot measured42.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro74.1%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%66.1%Muse Spark 1.1
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science12741484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12521479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12751481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12321470Muse Spark 1.1
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1267Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1259Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1234Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text12831478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12671457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12741435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision10651293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English12971478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English12621471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12541515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German12571469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12341450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12181459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French12631492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish12691464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian12721482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12791484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12831462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12901448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12671438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English10721292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese10091348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured75.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Meta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024July 16, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next