Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads GPT-4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 12.7, and Muse Spark 1.1 costs 1.9x less per output token ($4.25 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 59 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
36.5
Output $/M
$8.00
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
59
vs boards won of 59 shared

GPT-4.1 or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $0.43).

Shared results
59
GPT-4.1 only
33
Muse Spark 1.1 only
37
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 32.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GPT-4.1 849 against Muse Spark 1.1 1260, 51.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 $8.00 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1BarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning010
Math02
Knowledge010
Web design06
General026
All shared boards059
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Aider polyglot52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)54.7%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)45.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ALE-Bench558.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding13901498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13911498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.733.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index136.7154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1195Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1042Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)54.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
BrowseComp-Plus36.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond65.4%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)72.4%86.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.6%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI-20.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleBench27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Chess puzzles3.0%34.0%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts13841485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert13641478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13931480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams12151305Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework12481287Muse Spark 1.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AA Math Index34.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 583.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13691482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13601487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro80.5%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.0%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.1%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.9%66.1%Muse Spark 1.1
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified31.1%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
GeoBench72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13821484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13791479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13991481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13691470Muse Spark 1.1
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites10381270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components9971289Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev10791269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz11041268Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D8491260Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories10251276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1235Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1271Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)68.3%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench68.3%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA25.6%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text13831478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13671457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13631435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision12101293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English13921478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13701471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese13821515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German13811469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13191450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean13381459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French13821492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish13761464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian13771482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish13891499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn13971484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13851462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13711448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13651438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English12091292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese12261348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text12181301Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humor11961288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: captioning1207Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1208Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12101253Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.0060Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.124Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.480Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1Meta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$8.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved task$0.37$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $0.43).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-4.1 costs $0.37 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next