Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads GPT-4.1 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 10.2, and GPT-4.1 Mini costs 2.7x less per output token ($1.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
31.9
Output $/M
$1.60
1
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
51
vs boards won of 52 shared

GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.60 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
52
GPT-4.1 Mini only
36
Muse Spark 1.2 only
45
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Mini not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 41.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GPT-4.1 Mini 836 against Muse Spark 1.2 1300, 58.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Mini takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 MiniBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning08
Math02
Knowledge19
Web design06
General020
All shared boards151
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Aider polyglot32.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified23.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index20.272.2Muse Spark 1.2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)58.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)48.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML37.6%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: coding13671505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT13601505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.239.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index134.9155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1074Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1170Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)50.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
GPQA Diamond67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.5%86.1%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.4%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI3.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzles1.0%27.0%Muse Spark 1.2
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13491489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert13381475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13621487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagrams11821317Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: homework1214Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AIME49.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math Index46.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 587.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13431484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work13471480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU Pro77.2%88.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LegalBench (Vals AI)78.0%85.3%Muse Spark 1.2
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.9%70.9%Muse Spark 1.2
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.9%80.4%Muse Spark 1.2
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%65.4%GPT-4.1 Mini
MedQA (Vals AI)84.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified12.7%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: science13281500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13241496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government13431517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance13221484Muse Spark 1.2
PRBench Finance30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
PRBench Legal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites9971312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components9591299Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev10701300Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz10341334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D8361300Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories9931312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)44.0%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench68.8%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA21.1%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text13411482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following13331462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12991436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision11811304Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English13561483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English13181476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese13291509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean12981462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French13581495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish13191484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian13241483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1326Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13541502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries13441473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language13191453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13001443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English11911291Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: Chinese1186Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11881313Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: humor1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1174Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 MiniMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.60$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved task$1.818$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.60 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-4.1 Mini costs $1.818 and Muse Spark 1.2 $0.64.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next