Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna leads GLM 5V Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.3 to 23.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna costs 3.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
21
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
58.0
Overall
61.6
Output $/M
$1.20
31
vs boards won of 52 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna: which to pick

Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Shared results
52
GLM 5V Turbo only
13
GPT-5.6 Luna only
68
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-5.6 Luna 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 13.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: GLM 5V Turbo 1356 against GPT-5.6 Luna 1520, 27.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-5.6 LunaTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Reasoning16
Math02
Knowledge22
Web design26
General168
All shared boards2131
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev14021518GPT-5.6 Luna
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.4Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured93.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured11.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured61.8%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured22.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured60.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured73.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SciCodeNot measured53.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.8%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.9%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1667.4Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding14661466GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: software and IT14601463GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena WebDev: React13861508GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561520GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena WebDev: from an image14251517GPT-5.6 Luna
SciCodeNot measured6.2%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.537.3GPT-5.6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.5Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured42.1Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1060Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1126Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveBench researchNot measured51.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench browserNot measured68.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured30.4%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured61.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured25.3%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured43.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
BALROGNot measured45.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$4,095Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured85.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured14.4%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%91.1%GPT-5.6 Luna
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%39.5%GPT-5.6 Luna
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured91.6%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ARC-AGINot measured88.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured59.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SimpleBenchNot measured46.8%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured43.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431451GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: expert14531478GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561460GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861273GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework12731282GPT-5.6 Luna
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured49.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured82.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured61.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ProofBenchNot measured60.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: math14421459GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471470GPT-5.6 Luna
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.2%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.3%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured42.4%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured41.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science14481433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331399GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361446GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: business and finance14351439GPT-5.6 Luna
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured35.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
Design Arena: websites12301255GPT-5.6 Luna
Design Arena: UI components12101248GPT-5.6 Luna
Design Arena: game dev12181195GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021212GPT-5.6 Luna
Design Arena: 3D12081121GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12271230GPT-5.6 Luna
Design Arena: SVG11501193GPT-5.6 Luna
Design Arena: ASCII art11161142GPT-5.6 Luna
LiveBench designNot measured76.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index168
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.0%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.4%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%83.7%GPT-5.6 Luna
DTBenchNot measured89.1%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMCANot measured48.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured61.9%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured42.5%Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text14371431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231437GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: creative writing14171396GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641257GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English14541441GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911470GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221455GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971415GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: French14431458GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: Spanish14521446GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321427GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321405GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311434GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Text: longer queries14381436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201419GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071402GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English12741263GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291294GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text12701264GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: humor12681190GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521257GPT-5.6 Luna
LMArena Document14161457GPT-5.6 Luna
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1156Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.0008Fits in one request

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.052Fits in one request

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026July 9, 2026
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.20
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.0
Independent measurements behind it16
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.04
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-5.6 Luna for coding?

Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Luna only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.6 Luna's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next