Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 4.9, and Gemma 3 27B costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 48 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 48 shared
Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $6.00 per million).
Model AGemma 3 27BGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen62.4/1005 independent benchmarks$1.32 per solved task
- Shared results
- 48
- Gemma 3 27B only
- 18
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
- 65
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads, 45.4 against 4.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads, 56.0 against 0.1.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a MMLU Pro result, 88.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a Design Arena: websites result, 1275.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) takes 1M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 27B $0.0002, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the number, $1.32.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 55.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 3 27B 22.5% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 100.0%, 77.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemma 3 27B $0.30 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 3 27B | Bars | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 8 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 26 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 48 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 4.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 60.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1674 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| AA Coding Index | 10.1 | 76.2 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.8% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 34.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.7% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 24.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.9% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.4% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.5% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.8% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| SciCode | 23.3% | 53.2% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 17.8% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1322 | 1502 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1354 | 1498 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1692 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1649 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1637 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| SciCode | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 4.9 | 45.4 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.0 | 157.4 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 0.1 | 56.0 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1300 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1305 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1224 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1196 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1234 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1233 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 967 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 69.9% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 32.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 42.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.1% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.1% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.9% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 10.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 63.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1261 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 29.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 93.7% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 88.2% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 23.9% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.8% | 92.8% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.4% | 43.1% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 47.7% | 92.7% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 46.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 38.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1340 | 1496 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1304 | 1507 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1353 | 1503 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1156 | 1323 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1160 | 1336 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 20.7 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 22.5% | 100.0% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 74.7% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 46.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 58.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MATH level 5 | 74.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1312 | 1501 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1327 | 1491 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 88.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.8% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.5% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.7% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 66.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 47.3% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| GeoBench | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1383 | 1512 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1391 | 1503 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1375 | 1492 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1360 | 1480 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 29.1% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1275 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1338 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1312 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1281 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1336 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1293 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1200 | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 78.6% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 78.4% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.1% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.2% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 65.4% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| IFBench | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 7.3% | 80.3% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 92.0% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMCA | 12.3% | 46.2% | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 79.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 20.0% | Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured |
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1483 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1321 | 1481 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1345 | 1477 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | 1313 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: English | 1377 | 1491 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1334 | 1473 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1346 | 1539 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: German | 1362 | 1478 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1287 | 1473 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1308 | 1460 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: French | 1368 | 1498 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1349 | 1489 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1349 | 1482 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1345 | 1471 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1345 | 1489 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1333 | 1488 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1347 | 1477 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1320 | 1464 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1188 | 1311 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1164 | 1358 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1156 | 1322 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1166 | 1304 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1151 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1196 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1177 | 1312 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | March 12, 2025 | September 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.08 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.30 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 62.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.32 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?
Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $6.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?
48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.