Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Gemini 4 Carbon leads Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on coding, 86.6 to 14.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
Coding
86.6
Overall
88.3
Output $/M
$10.00
27
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
14.8
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 27 shared

Gemini 4 Carbon or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 14.8 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
27
Gemini 4 Carbon only
46
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 14.8 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 58.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 4 Carbon 89.1% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 3.7%, 85.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 CarbonBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work60
Reasoning30
Knowledge10
Web design60
General40
All shared boards270
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench coding91.0%54.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev1768Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.1%0.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)89.1%3.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)65.2%0.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierCode 2.040.6%6.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierSWE61.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ALE-Bench2374.7956.7Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: coding1564Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1552Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena WebDev: React1792Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1770Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
GameBench 2Not measured48.1Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured0.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
CursorBench 4.060.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index60.013.6Gemini 4 Carbon
Epoch Capabilities Index169.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1224Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench research92.5%67.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench browser80.0%21.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench long agentic72.7%12.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)51.8%11.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)55.8%10.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)17.5%3.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
APEX-Agents84.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Vending-Bench 2$16,484Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoning90.6%74.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%8.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)69.0%13.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ARC-AGI-294.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
SimpleBench92.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Chess puzzles78.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Mystery game puzzles73.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
EBR-bench87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1551Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: expert1582Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FrontierMath, tier 495.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
MathArena85.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA-Omniscience53.5-2.9Gemini 4 Carbon
SimpleQA Verified77.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: science1535Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1525Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1542Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1520Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite78.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
PRBench Legal53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites13191160Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: UI components13571156Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: game dev13261078Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3D14341119Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: all code categories13481140Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench design80.2%60.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Vals Index70.5%29.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench data analysis86.5%64.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%69.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
GDPval-AA17331162Gemini 4 Carbon
Furniture assembly77.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1539Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1533Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: English1530Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: non-English1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1613Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: Russian1560Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1569Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1549Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1542Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.0070Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.130Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.500Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Carbon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 CarbonNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerGoogleNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 10, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding index86.614.8
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 14.8 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-super-vl" title="Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-super-vl">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL</a></p>