Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Solar Pro 4

Gemini 4 Argon leads Solar Pro 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 52.6 to 28.2, and Solar Pro 4 costs 16.7x less per output token ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
81.0
Overall
84.0
Output $/M
$10.00
37
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

Gemini 4 Argon or Solar Pro 4: which to pick

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Solar Pro 4 for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
37
Gemini 4 Argon only
57
Solar Pro 4 only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 34.1 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Gemini 4 Argon 2100.1 against Solar Pro 4 179.3, 64.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding70
Intelligence10
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design60
General130
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev16781371Gemini 4 Argon
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode61.8%48.0%Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MirrorCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ALE-Bench2100.1179.3Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: coding15461438Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: software and IT15561431Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: React16921363Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: HTML16431371Gemini 4 Argon
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index52.628.2Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1157Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench long agentic69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
LiveBench reasoning95.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.1%Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%29.8%Gemini 4 Argon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI-291.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Mystery game puzzles64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15461400Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: expert15501428Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15481427Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: math15361421Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: mathematical work15571427Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SimpleQA Verified76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: science15481404Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15551374Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: legal and government15481383Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: business and finance15251381Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websites13151176Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: UI components13331147Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: game dev13771169Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: data viz13321177Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: 3D13881178Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: all code categories13291182Gemini 4 Argon
LiveBench design73.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%70.7%Gemini 4 Argon
DTBench97.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMCA63.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text15321388Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: instruction following15341375Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: creative writing15271317Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: English15381414Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: non-English15221363Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Chinese16111422Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1358Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1320Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1383Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1400Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish15031409Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Russian15341357Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1304Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15561385Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: longer queries15471382Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: writing and language15291344Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15271332Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerGoogleUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026August 10, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.60
Coding index81.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Solar Pro 4 for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Solar Pro 4?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Solar Pro 4?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next