Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 29 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
81.0
Overall
52.6
Output $/M
$10.00
29
Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Shared results
29
Gemini 4 Argon only
63
Phi 4 only
16
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, Phi 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 61.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 4 Argon 100.0% against Phi 4 13.8%, 86.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against Phi 4 $0.14 per million output tokens, 71.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, Phi 4 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsPhi 4Ties
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math30
Knowledge40
General130
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev1678Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.1%Only Phi 4 measured
SciCode61.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Phi 4 measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ALE-Bench2100.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: coding15461231Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: software and IT15561228Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: React1692Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1643Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index52.65.9Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4130.5Gemini 4 Argon
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1147Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench long agentic69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured0.0%Only Phi 4 measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BALROGNot measured11.6%Only Phi 4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
LiveBench reasoning95.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.5%Only Phi 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%3.8%Gemini 4 Argon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%56.1%Gemini 4 Argon
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI-291.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Mystery game puzzles64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15461220Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: expert15501203Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15481230Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured18.0Only Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.0%Only Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%13.8%Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MATH level 5Not measured64.9%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math15361246Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: mathematical work15571254Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.4%Only Phi 4 measured
SimpleQA Verified76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMLUNot measured84.8%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science15481206Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15551202Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: legal and government15481241Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: business and finance15251199Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: websites1315Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: UI components1331Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: game dev1376Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: data viz1337Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: 3D1389Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1328Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench design73.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IFBenchNot measured23.5%Only Phi 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%0.0%Gemini 4 Argon
DTBench97.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMCA63.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.6%Only Phi 4 measured
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text15321217Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: instruction following15341201Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: creative writing15271181Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: English15381231Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: non-English15221197Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Chinese16111212Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1222Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1158Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1151Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1224Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish15031234Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Russian15341209Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: multi-turn15561206Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: longer queries15471217Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: writing and language15291198Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15271162Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonMicrosoft Phi 4
MakerGoogleMicrosoft
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026January 10, 2025
Context window1.05M16K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.07
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.14
Coding index81.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Phi 4 for coding?

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Phi 4?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Phi 4 costs $0.07 and $0.14. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Phi 4?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi 4 comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Phi 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next