Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Gemini 4 Argon leads GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 52.6 to 20.4, and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs 5.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
81.0
Overall
84.0
Output $/M
$10.00
11
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 11 shared

Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: which to pick

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
11
Gemini 4 Argon only
83
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
11
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 60.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: Gemini 4 Argon 1678 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 1244, 62.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design60
General10
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev16781244Gemini 4 Argon
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SciCode61.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MirrorCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ALE-Bench2100.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: coding1546Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1556Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: React1692Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML16431253Gemini 4 Argon
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index52.620.4Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1157Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench long agentic69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
LiveBench reasoning95.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%18.5%Gemini 4 Argon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI-291.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Mystery game puzzles64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1546Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: expert1550Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1548Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: math1536Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1557Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: science1548Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1555Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1548Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1525Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites13151111Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: UI components13331078Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: game dev13771092Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: data viz13321097Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: 3D1388988Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: all code categories13291093Gemini 4 Argon
Design Arena: SVGNot measured978Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1105Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LiveBench design73.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IFBenchNot measured67.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%66.7%Gemini 4 Argon
DTBench97.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMCA63.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text1532Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: English1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: non-English1522Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1611Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Russian1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1556Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1547Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1529Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026November 13, 2025
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.00
Coding index81.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for coding?

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next