LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 4 31B

Updated October 21, 2026. 45 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
80.5
Overall
52.6
Output $/M
$10.00
44
Gemma 4 31BGoogle
Coding
38.3
Overall
14.7
Output $/M
$0.40
1
vs boards won of 45 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 80.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.3 for Gemma 4 31B.

Pick Gemma 4 31B when output tokens cost 25.0x less, or when the benchmark that matters is SAGE (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
45
Gemini 4 Argon only
47
Gemma 4 31B only
23
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 80.5 from 2 benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B 38.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 61.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: Gemini 4 Argon 92.0% against Gemma 4 31B 4.0%, 88.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against Gemma 4 31B $0.40 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 4 31B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsGemma 4 31BTies
Coding80
Intelligence20
Agentic work30
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge50
Web design10
General161
All shared boards441
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
LiveBench coding89.7%49.0%Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev16781367Gemini 4 Argon
AA Coding IndexNot measured43.4Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode61.8%45.5%Gemini 4 Argon
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.3%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
ALE-Bench2100.1925.5Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: coding15461459Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: software and IT15561463Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: React16921359Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: HTML16431380Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
AA Intelligence Index52.614.7Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4143.0Gemini 4 Argon
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured4.2Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1151Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%44.4%Gemini 4 Argon
LiveBench browser92.0%4.0%Gemini 4 Argon
LiveBench long agentic69.9%13.3%Gemini 4 Argon
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured65.5%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
LiveBench reasoning95.1%68.3%Gemini 4 Argon
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.7%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%23.6%Gemini 4 Argon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%75.8%Gemini 4 Argon
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI-291.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Mystery game puzzles64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15461448Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: expert15501464Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15481456Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1283Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1310Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%73.3%Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: math15361463Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: mathematical work15571465Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured52.6%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SimpleQA Verified76.0%10.4%Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: science15481457Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15551451Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: legal and government15481438Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: business and finance15251430Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
Design Arena: websites1315Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: UI components1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: game dev1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: data viz1334Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: 3D1389Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1328Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench design73.7%58.4%Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index161
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%53.3%Gemini 4 Argon
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%55.0%Gemma 4 31B
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IFBenchNot measured75.6%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%69.7%Gemini 4 Argon
DTBench97.6%82.7%Gemini 4 Argon
LMCA63.7%39.3%Gemini 4 Argon
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured30.6%Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text15321443Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: instruction following15341433Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: creative writing15271417Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena VisionNot measured1276Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: English15381451Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: non-English15221430Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Chinese16111475Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1436Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish15031442Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Russian15341460Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1433Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15561452Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: longer queries15471446Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: writing and language15291432Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15271405Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1271Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1326Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1280Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1218Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1226Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1285Only Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1425Only Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
Gemma 4 31B$0.0004Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
Gemma 4 31B$0.011Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
Gemma 4 31B$0.044Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 4 31B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle Gemma 4 31B
MakerGoogleGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026April 2, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.40
Coding index80.538.3
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Gemma 4 31B for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 80.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.3 for Gemma 4 31B. Pick Gemma 4 31B when output tokens cost 25.0x less, or when the benchmark that matters is SAGE (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 4 31B?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B costs $0.20 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 4 31B?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 4 31B comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Gemma 4 31B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gemma-4-31b-it" title="Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 4 31B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gemma-4-31b-it">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 4 31B</a></p>