Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.3 to 7.7, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 4.2x less per output token ($0.72 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle
Coding
43.7
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$3.00
18
Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$0.72
0
vs boards won of 18 shared

Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: which to pick

Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a coding score, 43.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.72 vs $3.00 per million).

Shared results
18
Gemini 3 Flash Preview only
51
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
33
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 43.7 from 2 benchmarks, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 89.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3 Flash Preview 95.6% against Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 5.1%, 90.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3 Flash Preview $3.00 against Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3 Flash Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3 Flash PreviewBarsLlama 3.3 70B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge10
General40
All shared boards180
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured11.9Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)90.8%28.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)38.6%3.0%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Terminal-Bench64.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
GSO-Bench9.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
WeirdML61.6%14.4%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
ALE-Bench1367.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1268Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1273Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.37.7Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured127.3Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1110Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1063Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1090Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1050Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1161Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1036Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)11.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)18.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.4%26.6%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BALROG48.1%23.0%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
DeepResearch Bench49.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,635Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond87.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.8%49.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)36.6%3.6%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.4%47.4%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
ARC-AGI84.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
ARC-AGI-233.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
SimpleBench61.1%19.9%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Chess puzzles39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
VPCT72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1225Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1277Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MGSM (Vals AI)93.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
AA Math Index97.07.7Gemini 3 Flash Preview
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)97.0%7.7%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%5.1%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 417.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
ProofBench15.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MATH level 5Not measured41.6%Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1267Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1267Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro88.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)55.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%71.3%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
SimpleQA Verified66.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MMLUNot measured86.3%Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
GeoBench88.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1284Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1275Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1284Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1243Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1184Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1189Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index52.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
IFBench78.0%47.1%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%15.7%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
DTBench89.1%59.5%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMCA43.1%17.5%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured33.3%Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1274Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1242Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1250Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1303Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1236Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1217Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1251Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1150Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1142Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1282Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1269Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1259Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1280Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1255Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1255Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1241Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 3.3 70B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.0020Fits in one request
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.034Fits in one request
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.130Fits in one request
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3 Flash PreviewMeta Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MakerGoogleMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 17, 2025December 6, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.45
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.72
Coding index43.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for coding?

Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a coding score, 43.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.72 vs $3.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 and $0.72. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3 Flash Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3 Flash Preview's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next