Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mercury 2

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads Mercury 2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 10.8, and Mercury 2 costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.75 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
65.7
Output $/M
$3.75
37
Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

Gemini 3.7 Flash or Mercury 2: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.75 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
37
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
77
Mercury 2 only
5
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks, Mercury 2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 37.4 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Gemini 3.7 Flash 1587 against Mercury 2 1160, 71.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 against Mercury 2 $0.75 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.7 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 2 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.7 FlashBarsMercury 2Ties
Coding80
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Knowledge30
Web design80
General120
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
LiveBench coding80.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15911171Gemini 3.7 Flash
AA Coding Index71.531.1Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)65.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCode59.8%37.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.5%Only Mercury 2 measured
FrontierCode43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWE20.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.2%Only Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench904.3785.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: coding14991390Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14981385Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React15871160Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15931199Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1599Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCode13.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.610.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index158.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.6Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1223Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1208Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1229Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1243Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1264Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1235Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1058Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench research76.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browser56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic28.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)22.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)34.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)71.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)7.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured70.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
APEX-Agents67.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor Index5.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
GPQA Diamond93.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning87.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.5%77.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.9%17.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-284.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzles66.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14951362Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15121358Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871374Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1329Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1320Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME97.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 436.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1511Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1502Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
MMLU Pro90.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science15111343Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14941363Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government1496Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance14791349Gemini 3.7 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite71.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
Design Arena: websites13031036Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1296996Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: game dev1317984Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: data viz13151009Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1307982Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories13081021Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1283998Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art1276988Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench design73.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
LiveBench data analysis68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured69.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%43.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash
DTBench96.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMCA50.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text14891354Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14841328Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14881286Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1314Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14831378Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14871330Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15521414Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German1506Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1511Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1500Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian15151304Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14851357Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14921329Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14911300Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14771314Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1309Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1394Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1312Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.7 FlashInception Mercury 2
MakerGoogleInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 13, 2026March 4, 2026
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.25
Output $/Mtok$3.75$0.75
Coding index58.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it61
Cost per solved task$1.78Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Mercury 2 for coding?

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.75 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Mercury 2?

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Mercury 2?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mercury 2 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.7 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Mercury 2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next