Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra leads Gemini 3.7 Flash on coding, 63.9 to 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 3.2x less per output token ($3.75 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 110 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.7 Flash Replace GPT-5.6 Terra
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
65.7
Output $/M
$3.75
78
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
Coding
63.9
Overall
68.1
Output $/M
$12.00
30
vs boards won of 110 shared, 2 tied

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for coding: it scores 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.0 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for output tokens 3.2x cheaper ($3.75 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Model AGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle58.0/1006 independent benchmarks$1.78 per solved taskModel BGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI63.9/1006 independent benchmarks$0.42 per solved task
Shared results
110
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
4
GPT-5.6 Terra only
17
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra 63.9 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 13.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Gemini 3.7 Flash 904.3 against GPT-5.6 Terra 1951.4, 34.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 against GPT-5.6 Terra $12.00 per million output tokens, 3.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.7 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.7 FlashBarsGPT-5.6 TerraTies
Coding11101 tie
Intelligence02
Agentic work96
Reasoning132
Math24
Knowledge92
Web design81
General2631 tie
All shared boards78302 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1110
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
LiveBench coding80.5%86.2%GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena WebDev15911522Gemini 3.7 Flash
AA Coding Index71.576.7GPT-5.6 Terra
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.7%85.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.8%95.4%GPT-5.6 Terra
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)12.1%22.7%GPT-5.6 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)70.4%74.6%GPT-5.6 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)34.8%47.8%GPT-5.6 Terra
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%GPT-5.6 Terra
IOI (Vals AI)67.8%87.6%GPT-5.6 Terra
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)77.5%77.5%Tie
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)65.9%58.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%72.1%GPT-5.6 Terra
SciCode59.8%55.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured62.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
FrontierCode43.6%41.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierSWE20.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
WeirdMLNot measured78.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ALE-Bench904.31951.4GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: coding14991485Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14981482Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React15871513Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15931526Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image15991541Gemini 3.7 Flash
SciCode13.8%10.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.642.1GPT-5.6 Terra
Epoch Capabilities Index158.0160.1GPT-5.6 Terra
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index96
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps12231120Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps12081061Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps12291111Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: agents building Android apps12431062Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1264Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games12351083Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1058Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1105Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1058Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench research76.5%60.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench browser56.0%84.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
LiveBench long agentic28.3%48.4%GPT-5.6 Terra
SREBench (Vals AI)4.6%9.5%GPT-5.6 Terra
Finance Agent (Vals AI)59.0%54.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)22.8%30.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)34.6%41.4%GPT-5.6 Terra
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)71.3%66.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)7.1%10.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
APEX-Agents67.8%58.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Remote Labor Index5.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
BALROGNot measured53.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$7,343Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index132
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
GPQA Diamond93.9%90.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench reasoning87.8%90.6%GPT-5.6 Terra
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.0%86.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.5%92.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.9%42.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.8%93.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash
ARC-AGI95.5%96.5%GPT-5.6 Terra
ARC-AGI-284.6%83.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
SimpleBenchNot measured48.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Chess puzzles66.0%47.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Mystery game puzzles37.0%35.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts14951469Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15121496Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871465Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams13291295Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework13201312Gemini 3.7 Flash
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured51.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
OTIS Mock AIME97.2%99.7%GPT-5.6 Terra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.6%86.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
FrontierMath, tier 436.6%70.7%GPT-5.6 Terra
ProofBench58.0%74.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: math15111465Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work15021478Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index92
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
MMLU Pro90.1%86.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.3%85.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.7%76.2%GPT-5.6 Terra
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.7%67.3%GPT-5.6 Terra
MedCode (Vals AI)53.4%43.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
SimpleQA Verified69.2%43.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: science15111452Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14941430Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14961461Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14791448Gemini 3.7 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite71.2%52.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index81
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
Design Arena: websites13031268Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI components12961256Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: game dev13171229Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: data viz13151240Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: 3D13071134Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories13081241Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: SVG12831219Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art12761177Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench design73.2%76.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index263
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
LiveBench data analysis68.0%79.3%GPT-5.6 Terra
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured62.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.2%47.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.9%82.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.1%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
IFBenchNot measured71.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%83.0%Tie
DTBench96.8%93.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMCA50.4%54.9%GPT-5.6 Terra
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured83.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Furniture assembly26.7%54.2%GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text14891448Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14841456Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14881413Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision13141271Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: English14831449Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14871441Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15521514Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German15061460Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese15111454Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14811427Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French15001466Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14951451Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian15151452Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish15031446Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14851453Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14921454Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14911431Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14771418Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: English13091272Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese13941337Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text13221278Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor12991236Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: creative writing13121248Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena DocumentNot measured1472Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.0080Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.136Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.520Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.7 FlashOpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 13, 2026July 9, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$2.00
Output $/Mtok$3.75$12.00
Coding index58.063.9
Independent measurements behind it66
Cost per solved task$1.78$0.42
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GPT-5.6 Terra for coding?

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for coding: it scores 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.0 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for output tokens 3.2x cheaper ($3.75 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra?

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 and $12.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $1.78 and GPT-5.6 Terra $0.42.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra comparison based on?

110 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.7 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.6 Terra's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-gpt-5-6-terra" title="Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-gpt-5-6-terra">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra</a></p>