Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Updated October 21, 2026. 67 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 42.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.1 for Llama 4 Scout.
Pick Llama 4 Scout when output tokens cost 30.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.31M against 1.05M tokens.
- Shared results
- 67
- Gemini 3.5 Flash only
- 43
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 13
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 42.8 against 9.1.
One benchmark behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 33.6 against 6.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a AA Agentic Index result, 0.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 92.7% against 47.0%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a AIME result, 19.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 89.5% against 69.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 1268 against 750.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.5 Flash $0.0060, Llama 4 Scout $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.21, Llama 4 Scout $1.276.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash 42.8 from 1 benchmark, Llama 4 Scout 9.1 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 80.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI: Gemini 3.5 Flash 92.5% against Llama 4 Scout 0.5%, 92.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against Llama 4 Scout $0.30 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Bars | Llama 4 Scout | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 12 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 10 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 29 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 67 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 9.1% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 8.2 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.6% | 38.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 78.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 48.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 26.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 74.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 52.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.9% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| SciCode | 53.9% | 21.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 46.2% | 1.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 911.0 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1493 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1494 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1495 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1522 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1504 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.6 | 6.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.9 | 129.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 0.5 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1202 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1197 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1175 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1190 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1098 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1180 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1142 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1178 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 21.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 30.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 95.6% | 15.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,396 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | 47.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.3% | 58.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.2% | 58.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.7% | 3.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 92.8% | 51.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 92.5% | 0.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | 0.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 32.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| EBR-bench | 4.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1488 | 1266 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1495 | 1235 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1483 | 1293 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1323 | 1125 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1330 | 1148 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 19.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.2% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 14.0 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 14.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 7.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 62.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| ProofBench | 31.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 62.3% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1504 | 1287 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1495 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 89.5% | 69.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 72.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 64.7% | 46.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.4% | 55.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.1% | 57.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.9% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 23.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 75.2% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1495 | 1278 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1483 | 1275 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1488 | 1285 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1467 | 1257 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1268 | 750 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1272 | 767 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1263 | 773 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1236 | 896 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1244 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1266 | 790 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1254 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1253 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index290
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 59.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 49.9% | 34.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 76.6% | 50.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| IFBench | 76.3% | 39.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 74.3% | 27.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 57.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 12.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 36.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1279 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1467 | 1248 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1470 | 1249 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1308 | 1118 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: English | 1481 | 1304 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1475 | 1252 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1527 | 1255 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1494 | 1273 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1486 | 1206 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1448 | 1207 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1490 | 1283 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1480 | 1278 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1493 | 1263 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1516 | 1265 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1481 | 1280 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1483 | 1265 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1478 | 1269 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1459 | 1242 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1305 | 1143 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1377 | 1106 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1317 | 1117 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1321 | 1102 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1301 | 1126 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash | Meta Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | May 19, 2026 | April 5, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.31M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $9.00 | $0.30 |
| Coding index | 42.8 | 9.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.21 | $1.276 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 42.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.1 for Llama 4 Scout. Pick Llama 4 Scout when output tokens cost 30.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.31M against 1.05M tokens.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10 and $0.30. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.21 and Llama 4 Scout $1.276.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?
67 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 4 Scout's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.