Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Gemini 3.5 Flash on coding, 82.2 to 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($10.00 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 21 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
59.0
Output $/M
$9.00
0
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
21
vs boards won of 21 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash or Kimi K3.1 Pro: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($9.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
21
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
95
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
14
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 47.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Gemini 3.5 Flash 6.1% against Kimi K3.1 Pro 63.6%, 76.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsKimi K3.1 ProTies
Coding07
Agentic work03
Reasoning01
Math02
Web design07
General01
All shared boards021
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev14991695Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding Index70.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%63.6%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%84.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured81.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode53.9%60.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
WeirdML62.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench911.01932.8Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: coding1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React14951701Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML15221706Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured46.0Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Agentic Index26.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1203Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1176Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1182Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1144Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1039Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1136Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1081Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured77.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured75.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured39.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%24.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%37.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.7%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%31.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vals Science IndexNot measured44.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-Agents27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MCP Atlas83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%52.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench76.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBench31.0%91.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: math1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MathArena24.5%59.6%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
MMLU Pro89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite52.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Design Arena: websites12661325Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components12671400Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev12621410Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz12391300Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: 3D12401451Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories12651354Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG12521328Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: ASCII art1251Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured77.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured62.5%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%86.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCA47.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1471Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1489Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1517Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1460Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EQ-Bench 41077Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 Pro
MakerGoogleMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 19, 2026October 23, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$9.00$10.00
Coding index39.882.2
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$1.21Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($9.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison based on?

21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro</a></p>