Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 15 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
33.6
Output $/M
$9.00
15
GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 15 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GPT-4o-mini has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less.

Shared results
15
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
95
GPT-4o-mini only
12
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 61.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3.5 Flash 72.1% against GPT-4o-mini 0.0%, 72.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against GPT-4o-mini $0.60 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o-mini 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsGPT-4o-miniTies
Coding10
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Knowledge40
General30
All shared boards150
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
LMArena WebDev1499Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured11.4Only GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%26.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.4%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCode53.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
WeirdML62.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench911.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1522Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.66.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9126.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1175Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1190Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1142Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1179Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-Agents27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%44.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%56.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%42.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%4.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%0.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SimpleBench76.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
AIMENot measured11.5%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured72.6%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured86.2%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.7Only GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.7%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GSM8KNot measured91.3%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: math1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
MMLU Pro89.5%62.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%45.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%60.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%54.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured72.4%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.8%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMLUNot measured81.8%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: science1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
Design Arena: websites1268Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1273Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1254Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1254Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench76.3%31.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
DTBench94.7%54.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMCA47.1%10.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
PIQANot measured88.7%Only GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1470Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1475Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1516Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o-mini
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashOpenAI GPT-4o-mini
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 19, 2026July 18, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$9.00$0.60
Coding index39.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.21Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than GPT-4o-mini for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-4o-mini has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-4o-mini?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-4o-mini?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o-mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next