Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.6 to 8.4, at about the same output price ($9.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
11
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
1
vs boards won of 12 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-4o (2024-11-20): which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
12
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
100
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
12
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 89.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3.5 Flash 95.6% against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3%, 89.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math10
Knowledge41
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured18.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena WebDev1499Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%43.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode53.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GSO-BenchNot measured0.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML62.6%25.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
CybenchNot measured12.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-Bench911.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1522Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AA Intelligence Index33.68.4Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1174Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1185Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1156Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-Agents27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured8.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
GPQA Diamond92.7%53.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%62.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%47.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench76.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
VPCTNot measured40.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AIMENot measured11.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%6.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured49.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: math1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
MMLU Pro89.5%72.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%82.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%45.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%74.5%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%57.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GeoBenchNot measured71.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: science1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Design Arena: websites1267Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1237Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1243Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1254Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCA47.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured81.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1470Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1475Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1516Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 19, 2026November 20, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$2.50
Output $/Mtok$9.00$10.00
Coding index39.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.21Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next