Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on coding, 71.9 to 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 8.0x less per output token ($2.50 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
40
vs boards won of 40 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
40
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
45
Muse Wonder only
20
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 31.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 13.0% against Muse Wonder 84.0%, 71.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsMuse WonderTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge04
General016
All shared boards040
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
LMArena WebDev14351652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%80.4%Muse Wonder
SciCode41.3%60.3%Muse Wonder
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14511515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React14081641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1694Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1243Only Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,432Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert14341513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401506Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%84.0%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math14341486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: science14511506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14311505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14231483Muse Wonder
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1362Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1379Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1376Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1317Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1427Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1371Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%70.2%Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%80.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench83.5%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA37.6%56.8%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text14351502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14191491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14211491Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English14381507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14271492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14681537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1454Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: French14511523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian14431522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1437Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14351493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14281496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141482Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Wonder
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteMeta Muse Wonder
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$4.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$20.00
Coding index49.071.9
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Muse Wonder?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-meta-muse-wonder" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Wonder, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-meta-muse-wonder">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Wonder</a></p>