Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 61 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout: which to pick
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).
- Shared results
- 61
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
- 24
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 21
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 22.2 against 6.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 14.3 against 0.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 83.8% against 47.0%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a AIME result, 19.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 85.8% against 69.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a Design Arena: websites result, 750.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.0015, Llama 4 Scout $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41, Llama 4 Scout $1.276.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 37.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 71.1% against Llama 4 Scout 7.8%, 63.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Llama 4 Scout $0.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Bars | Llama 4 Scout | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 12 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 10 | 0 | ||
| General | 28 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 61 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 9.1% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| AA Coding Index | 49.3 | 8.2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 79.0% | 38.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 37.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 6.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 50.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.9% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 21.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 1.5% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| WeirdML | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ALE-Bench | 765.3 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1451 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1408 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1448 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 6.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.2 | 6.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.9 | 129.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 14.3 | 0.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 47.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 13.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 43.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 15.5% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 28.1% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.8% | 47.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 58.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.8% | 58.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.8% | 3.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% | 51.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| ARC-AGI | 53.5% | 0.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | 0.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1441 | 1266 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1434 | 1235 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1440 | 1293 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1284 | 1125 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1291 | 1148 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 36.9% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 19.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.2% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 14.0 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 14.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | 7.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 26.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ProofBench | 13.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 62.3% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1434 | 1287 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1433 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.8% | 69.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 72.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.7% | 46.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.6% | 55.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | 57.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.9% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 43.5% | 23.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 75.2% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1451 | 1278 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1438 | 1275 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1431 | 1285 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1423 | 1257 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 750 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 768 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 773 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 896 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 790 | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index280
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 47.3% | 34.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 70.9% | 50.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| IFBench | Not measured | 39.5% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.0% | 27.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 57.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 12.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 36.0% | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1279 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1419 | 1248 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1421 | 1249 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | 1118 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | 1304 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1427 | 1252 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1468 | 1255 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: German | 1454 | 1273 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1426 | 1206 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1407 | 1207 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: French | 1451 | 1283 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1441 | 1278 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1443 | 1263 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1437 | 1265 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1445 | 1280 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1435 | 1265 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1428 | 1269 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1414 | 1242 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1269 | 1143 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1311 | 1106 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1280 | 1117 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1287 | 1102 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1260 | 1126 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Meta Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 21, 2026 | April 5, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.31M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.175 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 49.0 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.41 | $1.276 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 and $0.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.41 and Llama 4 Scout $1.276.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?
61 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Scout's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.