LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Updated October 21, 2026. 37 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
33.6
Overall
22.2
Output $/M
$2.50
37
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 33.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 4.2x less.

Shared results
37
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
46
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
9
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 33.6 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 36.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 71.1% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9%, 64.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Coding30
Reasoning60
Math40
Knowledge40
General200
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode41.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
WeirdML39.0%11.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531290Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT14511291Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev: React1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%37.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles21.0%3.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Mystery game puzzles19.0%12.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411267Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: expert14341234Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401278Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%6.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%0.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math14341267Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331271Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science14511286Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381282Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: legal and government14311305Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: business and finance14231265Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text14351286Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following14191258Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing14211268Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision12691066Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: English14381301Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English14271266Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese14681265Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: German14541272Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Japanese14261216Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean14071195Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: French14511297Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Spanish14411276Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Russian14431275Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish14371244Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451285Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14351289Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language14281282Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141253Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: English12691072Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: Chinese13111033Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026July 18, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.60
Coding index33.63.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 33.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 4.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next