Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 39.5 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 6.7x less per output token ($1.80 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$12.00
23
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
1
vs boards won of 24 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding: it scores 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 4.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a lower cost per solved task ($0.99 against $1.35) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
24
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
113
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 28.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MMMU Pro (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 88.2% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 22.8%, 65.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding40
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge61
General50
All shared boards231
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LMArena WebDev1447Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%85.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%71.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%15.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode58.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6608.9Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: coding1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index29.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1125Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1049Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1113Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1092Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1040Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911$1Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MCP Atlas78.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA Diamond95.5%87.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%22.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%84.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%8.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Mystery game puzzles34.0%17.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME98.1%86.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%86.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MathArena30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro91.0%87.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%85.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%59.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%60.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%95.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%25.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: science1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite67.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1224Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1209Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1230Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%30.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DTBench97.1%80.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMCA53.8%36.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CL-bench20.8%19.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%12.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1466Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1455Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1498Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1465Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MultiChallenge71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EQ-Bench 41142Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$12.00$1.80
Coding index32.339.5
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved task$0.99$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding: it scores 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 4. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a lower cost per solved task ($0.99 against $1.35) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $0.99 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20</a></p>