Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Saba

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads Saba on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.7 to 6.5, and Saba costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$12.00
3
SabaMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Saba: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Saba has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Saba for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $12.00 per million).

Shared results
3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
130
Saba only
1
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Saba not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 47.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.1% against Saba 42.4%, 51.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Saba $0.60 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Saba 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsSabaTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
LMArena WebDev1447Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode58.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.76.5Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1125Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1048Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1114Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1153Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1066Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
GPQA Diamond95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%42.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%4.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
MMLU Pro91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.1%Only Saba measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite67.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
Design Arena: websites1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1227Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1203Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1209Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1231Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1285Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index38 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1466Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1455Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1498Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1465Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSabaLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
Saba$0.0005Fits in one request

Saba costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
Saba$0.012Exceeds the context window

Saba costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
Saba$0.046Exceeds the context window

Saba costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Saba
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMistral Saba
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026February 17, 2025
Context window1.05M33K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$12.00$0.60
Coding index32.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Saba for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Saba has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Saba for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $12.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Saba?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Saba costs $0.20 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Saba?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Saba comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Saba's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next