Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax M2

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.7 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 11.8x less per output token ($1.02 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$12.00
44
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
0
vs boards won of 44 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 11.8x cheaper ($1.02 vs $12.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.702 against $0.99).

Shared results
44
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
93
MiniMax M2 only
6
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 28.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 80.2% against MiniMax M2 30.0%, 50.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 11.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design70
General170
All shared boards440
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev14471297Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SciCode58.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%25.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench80.2%30.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14841371Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14871373Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev: React1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML14901306Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index29.718.6Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1125Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1049Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1113Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1092Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1040Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%86.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
APEX-Agents35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911$161Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MCP Atlas78.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%77.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%13.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851357Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: expert14831338Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14801376Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math14861351Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14781368Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MathArena30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science14971348Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14861367Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14871349Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14591336Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite67.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websites12341143Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: UI components12241134Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: game dev12021118Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: data viz12091140Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: 3D12341098Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: all code categories12301135Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: SVG12841100Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%72.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%64.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text14801340Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following14661329Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14821286Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14781364Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14761313Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese15271366Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: German14901357Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1455Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French14871336Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14811326Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14971330Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Polish14981312Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871361Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries14821331Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14811295Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14651298Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MultiChallenge71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EQ-Bench 41142Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M2
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2
MakerGoogleMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026October 23, 2025
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.255
Output $/Mtok$12.00$1.02
Coding index32.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved task$0.99$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 11.8x cheaper ($1.02 vs $12.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.702 against $0.99).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M2?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $0.99 and MiniMax M2 $0.702.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M2?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next