Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 77.4 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-6.1 Terra costs 2.4x less per output token ($5.00 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
56.0
Output $/M
$12.00
4
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
21
vs boards won of 25 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-6.1 Terra: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for work measured by SciCode or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
25
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
112
GPT-6.1 Terra only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 34.9 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 26.8% against GPT-6.1 Terra 92.7%, 65.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-6.1 Terra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsGPT-6.1 TerraTies
Coding16
Agentic work03
Reasoning22
Math03
Knowledge10
Web design04
General03
All shared boards421
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index16
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured94.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev14471673GPT-6.1 Terra
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%49.5%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%84.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode58.7%55.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.62608.8GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: coding1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React14381657GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML14891719GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured51.0Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1127Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1046Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1077Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1049Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1024Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1051Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveBench researchNot measured73.9%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench browserNot measured93.1%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured48.6%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%15.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%26.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%68.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MCP Atlas78.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
GPQA Diamond95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%46.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%94.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%74.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
EBR-bench14.3%78.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)Not measured35.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%100.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%90.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%92.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MathArena30.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
MMLU Pro91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%57.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: science1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite60.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Design Arena: websites12331283GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: UI components12211277GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: game dev12011348GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: data viz1210Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1231Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories12291295GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: SVG1282Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1267Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Vals IndexNot measured60.5%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured82.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%82.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%79.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1466Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1455Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1479Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1466Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MultiChallenge71.4%74.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
EQ-Bench 41132Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-6.1 Terra
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewOpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026October 26, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$12.00$5.00
Coding index32.377.4
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GPT-6.1 Terra for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for work measured by SciCode or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-6.1 Terra?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-6.1 Terra?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-6.1 Terra's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-gpt-6-1-terra" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-gpt-6-1-terra">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra</a></p>