Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 39.0 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemma 4 31B costs 30.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 61 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemma 4 31B: which to pick
Pick Gemma 4 31B for coding: it scores 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 4.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 61
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
- 72
- Gemma 4 31B only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B scores 39.0 against 32.3.
4 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads, 29.7 against 14.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads, 8.2 against 4.2.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a GPQA Diamond result, 95.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a AIME result, 98.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a MMLU Pro result, 91.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a Design Arena: websites result, 1234.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $0.0080, Gemma 4 31B $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the number, $0.99.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B 39.0 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 17.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SimpleQA Verified: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.5% against Gemma 4 31B 10.4%, 63.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Gemma 4 31B $0.40 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 4 31B 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Bars | Gemma 4 31B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 11 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 0 | ||
| General | 27 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 60 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index110
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 49.0% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | 1367 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| AA Coding Index | 68.8 | 43.4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 88.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 78.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 2.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 32.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 17.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 70.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 6.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SciCode | 58.7% | 45.5% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.8% | 36.4% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| GSO-Bench | 22.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | 52.3% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1160.6 | 925.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1484 | 1459 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1487 | 1463 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1438 | 1359 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1490 | 1380 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1481 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SciCode | 14.3% | 8.9% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 29.7 | 14.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 143.0 | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 8.2 | 4.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1125 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1068 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1093 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1048 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1236 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1114 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1153 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1066 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 44.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 4.0% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 13.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 43.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 9.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 1.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Vals Science Index | 27.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 95.6% | 65.5% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| APEX-Agents | 35.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| METR time horizons | 77.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| BALROG | 57.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| PostTrainBench | 22.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $911 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 68.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 94.1% | 85.7% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 47.0% | 23.6% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 94.4% | 75.8% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| ARC-AGI | 98.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Chess puzzles | 51.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 34.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| EBR-bench | 14.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1485 | 1448 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1483 | 1464 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1480 | 1456 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1311 | 1283 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1316 | 1310 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 63.5% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 98.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 73.3% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 59.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| ProofBench | 26.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1486 | 1463 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1478 | 1465 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 91.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 87.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 64.8% | 52.6% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 64.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 69.4% | 61.4% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 96.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | 10.4% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: science | 1497 | 1457 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1486 | 1451 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1487 | 1438 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1459 | 1430 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 67.4% | 45.3% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1234 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1227 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1203 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1209 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1234 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1231 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1285 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1270 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 58.4% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index271
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 53.3% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 53.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.7% | 55.0% | Gemma 4 31B |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 76.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 56.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| IFBench | 77.1% | 75.6% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.0% | 69.7% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| DTBench | 97.1% | 82.7% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMCA | 53.8% | 39.3% | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 30.6% | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Furniture assembly | 26.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1443 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1466 | 1433 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1482 | 1417 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | 1276 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: English | 1478 | 1451 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1476 | 1430 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1527 | 1475 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: German | 1490 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1491 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1455 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1487 | 1436 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1481 | 1442 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1497 | 1460 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1498 | 1433 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1487 | 1452 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1482 | 1446 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1481 | 1432 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1465 | 1405 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1287 | 1271 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1364 | 1326 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1304 | 1282 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1322 | 1280 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1345 | 1218 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1330 | 1226 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1324 | 1285 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | 1425 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 4 31B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Google Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ||
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | February 19, 2026 | April 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $12.00 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | 32.3 | 39.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.99 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Gemma 4 31B for coding?
Pick Gemma 4 31B for coding: it scores 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 4. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 4 31B comparison based on?
61 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemma 4 31B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.