Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 33.2 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($1.28 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 57 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
5
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
52
vs boards won of 57 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for coding: it scores 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI) or Design Arena: ASCII art, where it leads.

Model AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle22.7/1003 independent benchmarks$0.18 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
57
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
22
Qwen3.7 Plus only
18
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 22.0 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 0.0% against Qwen3.7 Plus 46.4%, 46.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge14
Web design17
General322
All shared boards552
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev1257Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index34.755.9Qwen3.7 Plus
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%46.4%Qwen3.7 Plus
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%12.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%52.8%Qwen3.7 Plus
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCodeNot measured46.1%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
ALE-Bench797.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14001473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14131473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena WebDev: React1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1276Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1336Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.625.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.0Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index1.617.5Qwen3.7 Plus
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%38.2%Qwen3.7 Plus
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%10.5%Qwen3.7 Plus
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%16.4%Qwen3.7 Plus
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%49.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14071460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert13981466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14031460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams12421292Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: homework12711295Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14281467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14171470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%66.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: science14251464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14181451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance13891435Qwen3.7 Plus
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites10831269Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: UI components10721261Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: game dev10291262Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: data viz10451276Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: 3D10481239Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: all code categories10721269Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: SVG10521208Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: ASCII art11671143Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index322
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%39.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%53.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DTBenchNot measured84.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text14161454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following13771439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing14011438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12401278Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: English14141458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14101445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14601509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German14301471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese14131412Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Korean13921413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French14241472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14211457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14201457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish14431449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14171459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries13941454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language14081437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13861422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English12321280Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: Chinese12781332Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: reading text12461288Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: humor12661261Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12481258Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.32
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.28
Coding index22.733.2
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.18Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for coding: it scores 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI) or Design Arena: ASCII art, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>