Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 70.3 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 2.8x less per output token ($1.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 71 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Replace Muse Spark 1.1
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
2
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
68
vs boards won of 71 shared, 1 tied

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.43).

Model AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle22.7/1003 independent benchmarks$0.18 per solved taskModel BMuse Spark 1.1Meta70.3/1003 independent benchmarks$0.43 per solved task
Shared results
71
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
9
Muse Spark 1.1 only
33
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 0.0% against Muse Spark 1.1 72.2%, 72.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding0121 tie
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge18
Web design08
General126
All shared boards2681 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index012
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDev12571542Muse Spark 1.1
AA Coding Index34.771.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%82.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%72.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%31.1%Muse Spark 1.1
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%69.3%Muse Spark 1.1
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ALE-Bench797.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14001498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14131498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: React12451532Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: HTML12761540Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: from an image13361540Muse Spark 1.1
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.633.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic Index1.625.8Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1134Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%57.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%38.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%56.4%Muse Spark 1.1
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond81.1%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%86.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14071485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert13981478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14031480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams12421305Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework12711287Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14281482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14171487Muse Spark 1.1
MathArenaNot measured42.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro86.2%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%66.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14251484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14181481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13891470Muse Spark 1.1
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites10821270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components10691287Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev10291269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz10451267Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D10471259Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories10711276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVG10521234Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: ASCII art11671269Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index126
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%45.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%88.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%66.7%Muse Spark 1.1
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text14161478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13771457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14011435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision12401293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English14141478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English14101471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14601515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German14301469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese14131450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean13921459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14241492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14211464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian14201482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish14431499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14171484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13941462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14081448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13861438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English12321292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese12781348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text12461301Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humor12661288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12481253Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallenge60.6%75.3%Muse Spark 1.1
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.50$4.25
Coding index22.770.3
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.18$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.43).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Muse Spark 1.1?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

71 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Muse Spark 1.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Muse Spark 1.1</a></p>