Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 53.4 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 2.7x less per output token ($1.50 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
0
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.00
21
vs boards won of 22 shared, 1 tied

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Kimi K2.7 Code: which to pick

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.35).

Shared results
22
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
57
Kimi K2.7 Code only
29
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 22.9 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 0.0% against Kimi K2.7 Code 47.2%, 47.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding0111 tie
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Web design08
All shared boards0211 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDev12571474Kimi K2.7 Code
AA Coding Index34.760.8Kimi K2.7 Code
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%82.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%78.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%47.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%25.4%Kimi K2.7 Code
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%67.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.7%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-Bench797.7886.2Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text: coding1400Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React12451475Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: HTML12761451Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: from an image13361513Kimi K2.7 Code
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.625.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic Index1.621.0Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1138Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1130Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1151Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1129Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured90.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1398Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1403Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1242Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: math1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: science1425Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1418Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1389Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websites10821263Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: UI components10691255Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: game dev10291220Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: data viz10451227Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: 3D10471240Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: all code categories10721252Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: SVG10521176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: ASCII art11671196Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1401Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1414Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1410Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1430Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1392Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1420Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1394Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1386Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1232Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1248Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerGoogleMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026June 12, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.95
Output $/Mtok$1.50$4.00
Coding index22.753.4
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.18$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.35).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and Kimi K2.7 Code $0.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-kimi-k2-7-code" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-kimi-k2-7-code">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code</a></p>