Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.5 to 10.4, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 11.1x less per output token ($0.40 vs $4.425 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Replace Qwen3.7 Max
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
54.1
Overall
61.7
Output $/M
$4.425
18
vs boards won of 18 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 11.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.425 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Model AGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 MaxQwen54.1/1003 independent benchmarks$4.69 per solved task
Shared results
18
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
12
Qwen3.7 Max only
41
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 75.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 19.0% against Qwen3.7 Max 94.7%, 75.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 11.1x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning03
Knowledge05
General05
All shared boards018
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1515Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured66.0Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%87.1%Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured68.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured49.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max
ALE-BenchNot measured1189.4Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1514Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1512Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.429.5Qwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8154.0Qwen3.7 Max
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1155Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1161Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1158Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1197Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%90.2%Qwen3.7 Max
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%40.5%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured34.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%89.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%84.9%Qwen3.7 Max
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%63.7%Qwen3.7 Max
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%75.3%Qwen3.7 Max
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%38.8%Qwen3.7 Max
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured55.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1274Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1270Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1266Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1217Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1211Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%79.4%Qwen3.7 Max
IFBench49.9%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%79.0%Qwen3.7 Max
DTBench62.8%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LMCA18.1%44.0%Qwen3.7 Max
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 Max
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025May 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.475
Output $/Mtok$0.40$4.425
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.1
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 11.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.425 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.7 Max only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next