Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.5
Updated October 21, 2026. 18 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens.
- Shared results
- 18
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
- 10
- Grok 4.5 only
- 102
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 leads, 38.8 against 10.4.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Grok 4.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 41.2.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 leads, 92.9% against 70.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a AIME result, 42.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 leads, 89.2% against 79.1%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Grok 4.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1281.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.0003, Grok 4.5 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Grok 4.5 has the number, $0.62.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 26.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 6.8% against Grok 4.5 42.7%, 35.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Grok 4.5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.5 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Bars | Grok 4.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 6 | ||
| General | 0 | 5 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 17 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 94.3% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1553 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 72.4 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 71.4% | 87.3% | Grok 4.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.6% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.6% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 36.6% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.6% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.8% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 55.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 42.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 46.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1309.3 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1474 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1471 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1556 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1567 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1562 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 10.4 | 38.8 | Grok 4.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.8 | 154.1 | Grok 4.5 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 41.2 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1218 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1249 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1221 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1242 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1229 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1236 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1204 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1233 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 85.9% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 44.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 27.9% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.8% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 24.9% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.9% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 6.3% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 56.2% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 23.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $3,887 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1216 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.2% | 92.9% | Grok 4.5 |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 87.2% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 75.4% | 61.8% | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.5% | 93.1% | Grok 4.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | 42.7% | Grok 4.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 93.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 87.2% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 52.6% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 70.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 35.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1462 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1465 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1464 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1304 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1295 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 42.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| AA Math Index | 53.3 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 97.8% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 57.2% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 24.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 31.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1460 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1482 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.1% | 89.2% | Grok 4.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.0% | 86.0% | Grok 4.5 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 67.4% | Grok 4.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 66.2% | 71.7% | Grok 4.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 61.8% | Grok 4.5 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 34.2% | 43.3% | Grok 4.5 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 48.3% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1464 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1440 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1463 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1441 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1281 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1279 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1263 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1266 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1257 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1275 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1215 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1257 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 78.1% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 73.0% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 30.8% | 35.0% | Grok 4.5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 75.8% | 86.9% | Grok 4.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 63.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| IFBench | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 55.7% | 79.3% | Grok 4.5 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 96.5% | Grok 4.5 |
| LMCA | 18.1% | 45.2% | Grok 4.5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 74.4% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 22.5% | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1448 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1445 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1442 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1287 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1453 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1440 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1495 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1448 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1430 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1406 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1457 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1451 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1449 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1432 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1456 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1462 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1445 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1434 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1285 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1345 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1293 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1276 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1293 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1452 | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | SpaceXAI Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 22, 2025 | July 8, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 58.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.62 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Grok 4.5 for coding?
Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.5?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.5?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.5 comparison based on?
18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.5's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.