Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 leads Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.9 to 10.4, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
10.4
Output $/M
$0.40
3
Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$2.50
17
vs boards won of 20 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
20
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
8
Grok 4.3 only
84
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 78.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 19.0% against Grok 4.3 97.7%, 78.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Grok 4.3 $2.50 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.3 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsGrok 4.3Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Knowledge15
General24
All shared boards317
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1358Only Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured42.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%84.5%Grok 4.3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%37.9%Grok 4.3
WeirdMLNot measured49.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured944.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1415Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1416Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1353Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1367Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1375Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.424.9Grok 4.3
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.5Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1126Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1006Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1059Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured961Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured914Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1007Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1008Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1013Only Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured18.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%97.7%Grok 4.3
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$35Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1166Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
GPQA Diamond70.2%91.4%Grok 4.3
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%83.1%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%90.1%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%37.2%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1402Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
AIME42.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured42.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured14.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured11.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1387Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
MMLU Pro79.1%85.8%Grok 4.3
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%84.5%Grok 4.3
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%68.5%Grok 4.3
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%70.8%Grok 4.3
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%48.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%38.1%Grok 4.3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured33.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1386Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1381Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1196Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1192Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1174Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1179Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1187Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1081Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%19.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%74.4%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured43.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench49.9%83.3%Grok 4.3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%75.0%Grok 4.3
DTBench62.8%90.7%Grok 4.3
LMCA18.1%38.3%Grok 4.3
LMArena TextNot measured1397Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1366Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1380Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1229Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1404Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1422Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1395Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1354Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1411Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1393Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1257Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1217Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.3
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteSpaceXAI Grok 4.3
MakerGooglexAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025April 30, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.40$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked37.4
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.31
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Grok 4.3 for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.3 comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.3's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next