Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 Mini leads Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 10.4, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 11.3x less per output token ($0.40 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
1
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
44.0
Output $/M
$4.50
19
vs boards won of 20 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 11.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Shared results
20
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
10
GPT-5.4 Mini only
69
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 64.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 19.0% against GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3%, 64.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 per million output tokens, 11.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsGPT-5.4 MiniTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning14
Math01
Knowledge04
General05
All shared boards119
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1397Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured56.1Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%81.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured2.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured52.1%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%52.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
FrontierCodeNot measured27.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1188.6Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1436Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1419Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.424.1GPT-5.4 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8148.7GPT-5.4 Mini
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured17.9Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%83.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
DeepResearch BenchNot measured36.3%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%83.1%GPT-5.4 Mini
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%79.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%87.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%28.1%GPT-5.4 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured63.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured18.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured23.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured11.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1424Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1435Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1420Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1285Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%37.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AIME42.1%95.6%GPT-5.4 Mini
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured51.2%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured9.8%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured21.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1418Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1429Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%84.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%60.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%71.2%GPT-5.4 Mini
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%63.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured29.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1417Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1395Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1414Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1418Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%50.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured54.2%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench49.9%73.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%77.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
DTBench62.8%80.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
LMCA18.1%40.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena TextNot measured1412Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1370Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1245Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1412Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1375Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1370Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1441Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1415Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1429Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1408Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1393Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1373Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1244Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1286Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1222Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Mini
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteOpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025March 17, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.75
Output $/Mtok$0.40$4.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked35.8
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.70
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.4 Mini for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 11.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 and $4.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Mini's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next