Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.6 to 10.4, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs 3.8x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
1
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
12
vs boards won of 13 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by MedScribe (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
17
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
66
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 41.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AIME: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 42.1% against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 83.3%, 41.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Flash LiteBarsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Math01
Knowledge06
General11
All shared boards112
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1257Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured34.7Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.4%80.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)59.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-BenchNot measured797.7Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1400Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1413Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1245Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1336Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.415.6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index133.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.6Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured30.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)36.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond70.2%81.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)75.4%82.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)62.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1407Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1403Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1242Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1271Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AIME42.1%83.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MGSM (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Math Index53.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1428Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1417Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro79.1%86.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.0%83.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.6%59.4%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%71.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.6%68.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedQA (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.2%47.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1425Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1428Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1418Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1389Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured51.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1083Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1072Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1029Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1045Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1048Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1072Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1052Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1167Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.8%49.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8%63.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured41.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBench49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1416Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1377Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1401Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1240Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1414Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1410Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1460Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1430Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1413Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1392Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1424Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1421Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1420Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1443Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1417Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1408Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1386Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1232Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1278Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1246Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1266Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1259Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1248Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0003Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.0062Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.024Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MakerGoogleGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025March 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.7
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.18
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by MedScribe (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next