Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on coding, 71.9 to 38.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs 7.4x less per output token ($2.716 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek
Coding
38.7
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$2.716
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
45
vs boards won of 45 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.7 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 7.4x cheaper ($2.716 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
45
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 only
39
Muse Wonder only
15
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 38.7 from 5 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 28.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 16.0% against Muse Wonder 84.0%, 68.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $2.716 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 7.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning03
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design06
General015
All shared boards045
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
LMArena WebDev14471652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index59.4Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)11.1%49.5%Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)49.9%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)26.2%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Wonder measured
SciCodeNot measured60.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
FrontierCode17.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
WeirdML48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
ALE-Bench1006.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: coding14701522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14691515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React14411641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML14351694Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.4Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index149.1161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index26.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1000Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps948Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1059Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1227Only Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)44.1%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.2%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)23.1%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)51.6%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,285$9,432Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond89.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Chess puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14611506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert14631513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14661506Muse Wonder
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
OTIS Mock AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 345.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
ProofBench16.0%84.0%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math14431486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14551514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: science14701506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14661512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14641505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14431483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites12341362Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components12221374Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev12291377Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz12031321Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D12541426Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories12401371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1140Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1149Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.9%70.2%Muse Wonder
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.7%Only Muse Wonder measured
DTBench90.7%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA41.2%56.8%Muse Wonder
Surface Evolver Bench40.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CL-bench Life13.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text14511502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14451491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14461491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: English14591507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14391492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14811537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: French14731523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14531522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14681510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14581493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14471496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311482Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.0026Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.069Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.272Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Meta Muse Wonder
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 24, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.225$4.00
Output $/Mtok$2.716$20.00
Coding index38.771.9
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved task$0.57Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.7 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 7.4x cheaper ($2.716 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Muse Wonder?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $1.225 per million input tokens and $2.716 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Muse Wonder?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-meta-muse-wonder" title="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Muse Wonder, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-meta-muse-wonder">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Muse Wonder</a></p>