Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on coding, 65.4 to 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.87 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
3
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
45
vs boards won of 49 shared, 1 tied

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for work measured by IOI (Vals AI) or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
49
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
29
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
24
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 13.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 14.1% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 31.3%, 22.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Coding2111 tie
Intelligence01
Agentic work17
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge05
General014
All shared boards3451 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index211
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev15821625MiMo-V2.6-Pro
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%31.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%85.2%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%43.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%39.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%67.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%72.9%Tie
SciCode51.0%60.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.21158.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: coding14691533MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: software and IT14621528MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: React15881639MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661616MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.046.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1290Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%3.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%57.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%32.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%47.1%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%13.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%62.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%2.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
APEX-Agents47.3%54.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%49.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581511MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: expert14591541MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631520MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%70.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: math14411500MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431511MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%45.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science14571506MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461497MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government14591485MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: business and finance14421468MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1307Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1337Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1337Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1329Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1316Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals Index53.0%57.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%88.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%86.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text14461491MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following14481491MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing14391466MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: English14571504MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: non-English14311474MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese14811529MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14481479MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541466MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: longer queries14581501MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language14431470MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241465MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerDeepSeekXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.435
Output $/Mtok$1.98$0.87
Coding index56.165.4
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for work measured by IOI (Vals AI) or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro" title="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro</a></p>