DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro on coding, 56.1 to 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 2.2x less per output token ($0.9152 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 56 benchmarks have a result for both.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for coding: it scores 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $1.98 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.10).
- Shared results
- 56
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
- 22
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 14
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 scores 56.1 against 31.6.
5 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, 36.0 against 26.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, 41.3 against 21.3.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, 92.4% against 82.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, 87.0% against 84.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a Design Arena: websites result, 1266.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a Vals Index result, 53.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.0016, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.10, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 14.6 points apart on average over 14 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 82.3% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 34.1%, 48.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 11 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 3 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 5 | ||
| General | 5 | 13 | ||
| All shared boards | 29 | 27 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index113
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | 1480 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| AA Coding Index | 68.8 | 60.2 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.5% | 81.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 96.4% | 74.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 14.1% | 0.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 82.3% | 34.1% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 41.5% | 21.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 51.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 54.7% | 57.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 17.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 53.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 72.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SciCode | 51.0% | 50.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| FrontierCode | 28.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1403.2 | 899.8 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1469 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1462 | 1495 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1588 | 1469 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1566 | 1473 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 36.0 | 26.0 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.6 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 41.3 | 21.3 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 1.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 50.4% | 41.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 26.8% | 11.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 40.9% | 15.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 10.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 52.8% | 55.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 4.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.4% | 82.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.8% | 86.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.0% | 35.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 91.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 90.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 46.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 43.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1458 | 1486 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1459 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1463 | 1494 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 64.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ProofBench | 50.0% | 22.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1441 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1443 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index45
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.0% | 84.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | 77.1% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.4% | 61.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.1% | 73.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.5% | 32.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1457 | 1482 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1446 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1459 | 1474 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1442 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1246 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1261 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1257 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1243 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1265 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1182 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1156 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index513
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 53.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 80.2% | 83.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| IFBench | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.3% | 79.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| DTBench | 93.9% | 84.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMCA | 45.5% | 29.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text | 1446 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1448 | 1475 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1439 | 1438 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1457 | 1477 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1431 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1481 | 1507 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1459 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1410 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1449 | 1435 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1446 | 1487 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1435 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1448 | 1449 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1464 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1454 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1458 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1443 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1424 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.66 | $0.4575 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.98 | $0.9152 |
| Coding index | 56.1 | 31.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.10 | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for coding: it scores 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $1.98 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.10).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.10 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
56 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.