Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 21.4, at about the same output price ($1.98 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
33
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
9
vs boards won of 42 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Shared results
42
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
36
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
24
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 22.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1588 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 1388, 33.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding61
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning61
Math22
Knowledge22
General143
All shared boards339
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index61
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena WebDev15821400DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%44.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2621.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: coding14691464DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14621463Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena WebDev: React15881388DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661410DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.021.4DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6146.8DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents47.3%24.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%89.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%29.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%86.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%18.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581448DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14591462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631450DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%88.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%31.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math14411453Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science14571457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government14591441DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14421435DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1190Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1140Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1160Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1179Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index143
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%77.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%87.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%37.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text14461437DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14481424DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14391402DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English14571443DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14311430DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14811498Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean14491384DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: French14461462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Spanish14351441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Russian14481430DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541446DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14581441DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14431415DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241399DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.39
Output $/Mtok$1.98$2.34
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next