Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M2

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 1.9x less per output token ($1.02 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
30
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
0
vs boards won of 30 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.02 vs $1.98 per million).

Shared results
30
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
48
MiniMax M2 only
20
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 28.8 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1566 against MiniMax M2 1306, 43.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding40
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General140
All shared boards300
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev15821297DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SciCode51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding14691371DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14621373DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661306DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index36.018.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%77.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%13.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581357DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14591338DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631376DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math14411351DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431368DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science14571348DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461367DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: legal and government14591349DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14421336DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1143Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1134Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1118Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1140Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1098Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1135Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1100Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBenchNot measured72.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%64.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text14461340DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14481329DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14391286DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: English14571364DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14311313DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14811366DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French14461336DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Spanish14351326DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Russian14481330DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541361DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14581331DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14431295DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241298DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M2
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M2
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 23, 2025
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.255
Output $/Mtok$1.98$1.02
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$0.10$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.02 vs $1.98 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.10 and MiniMax M2 $0.702.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next