DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on coding, 71.9 to 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 10.1x less per output token ($1.98 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder: which to pick
Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for output tokens 10.1x cheaper ($1.98 vs $20.00 per million).
- Shared results
- 46
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
- 32
- Muse Wonder only
- 14
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder scores 71.9 against 56.1.
5 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 36.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a AA Agentic Index result, 41.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Muse Wonder has a Design Arena: websites result, 1363.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads, 64.9% against 53.0%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.0016, Muse Wonder $0.014 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the number, $0.10.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 17.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 14.1% against Muse Wonder 49.5%, 47.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 10.1x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Bars | Muse Wonder | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 12 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 6 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 16 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 46 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index012
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | 1652 | Muse Wonder |
| AA Coding Index | 68.8 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 96.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 14.1% | 49.5% | Muse Wonder |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 82.3% | 83.1% | Muse Wonder |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 41.5% | 62.5% | Muse Wonder |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 51.6% | 66.9% | Muse Wonder |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 54.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.6% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 17.5% | 26.6% | Muse Wonder |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 53.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 72.9% | 80.4% | Muse Wonder |
| SciCode | 51.0% | 60.3% | Muse Wonder |
| FrontierCode | 28.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1403.2 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1469 | 1522 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1462 | 1515 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1588 | 1641 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1566 | 1694 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 36.0 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.6 | 161.8 | Muse Wonder |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 41.3 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1260 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 1.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 50.4% | 56.6% | Muse Wonder |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 26.8% | 36.3% | Muse Wonder |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 40.9% | 50.5% | Muse Wonder |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 10.8% | 23.8% | Muse Wonder |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 52.8% | 67.1% | Muse Wonder |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.0% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 4.3% | 22.9% | Muse Wonder |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 39.1% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.2% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $9,432 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.5% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.0% | 50.1% | Muse Wonder |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 91.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 90.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 46.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 43.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1458 | 1506 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1459 | 1513 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1463 | 1506 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 64.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ProofBench | 50.0% | 84.0% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: math | 1441 | 1486 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1443 | 1514 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1457 | 1506 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1446 | 1512 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1459 | 1505 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1442 | 1483 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1363 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1380 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1378 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1312 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1428 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1371 | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 53.0% | 64.9% | Muse Wonder |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.2% | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.3% | 80.7% | Muse Wonder |
| DTBench | 93.9% | 95.2% | Muse Wonder |
| LMCA | 45.5% | 56.8% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text | 1446 | 1502 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1448 | 1491 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1439 | 1491 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: English | 1457 | 1507 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1431 | 1492 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1481 | 1537 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1449 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1446 | 1523 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1435 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1448 | 1522 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1454 | 1510 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1458 | 1493 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1443 | 1496 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1424 | 1482 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Muse Wonder | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Meta Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | October 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.66 | $4.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.98 | $20.00 |
| Coding index | 56.1 | 71.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.10 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Muse Wonder for coding?
Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for output tokens 10.1x cheaper ($1.98 vs $20.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?
46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.