Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 6.6, and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 3.5x less per output token ($0.56 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
34
Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.56
0
vs boards won of 34 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($0.56 vs $1.98 per million).

Shared results
34
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
44
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 52.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 98.6% against Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 3.6%, 95.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsLlama 3.1 70B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
General160
All shared boards340
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.2%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
SciCode51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.0%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%9.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding14691260DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14621260DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1566Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.06.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6125.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured15.2%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
BALROGNot measured27.9%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured6.9%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%40.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%4.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%44.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581241DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14591209DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631261DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured4.0Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.0%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%3.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MATH level 5Not measured36.7%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14411252DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431253DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.6%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLUNot measured80.1%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14571276DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461257DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: legal and government14591283DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14421235DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index160
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBenchNot measured34.4%Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
DTBench93.9%60.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%14.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text14461261DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14481231DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14391232DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: English14571294DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14311219DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14811215DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1222Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1132Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean14491140DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: French14461262DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Spanish14351253DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Russian14481234DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541256DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14581241DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14431236DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241230DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 3.1 70B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026July 23, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.56
Output $/Mtok$1.98$0.56
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($0.56 vs $1.98 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 and $0.56. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next