Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on coding, 82.2 to 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 5.1x less per output token ($1.98 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
58.0
Output $/M
$1.98
2
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
15
vs boards won of 17 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Kimi K3.1 Pro: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for output tokens 5.1x cheaper ($1.98 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
17
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
61
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
18
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 41.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 14.1% against Kimi K3.1 Pro 63.6%, 66.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsKimi K3.1 ProTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work22
Reasoning01
Math01
General02
All shared boards215
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev15821695Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%63.6%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%84.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%81.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%60.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.21932.8Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: coding1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15881701Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML15651706Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.146.0Kimi K3.1 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured77.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured75.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured39.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%24.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%37.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%11.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%31.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vals Science IndexNot measured44.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%52.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expert1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%91.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MathArenaNot measured59.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1325Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1400Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1410Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1300Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1451Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1354Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1328Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured77.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Vals Index53.0%62.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%86.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: English1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1482Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1447Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1447Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1447Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1454Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 Pro
MakerDeepSeekMoonshot AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 23, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.66$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.98$10.00
Coding index56.182.2
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for output tokens 5.1x cheaper ($1.98 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro" title="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro</a></p>