LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-4o

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
54.6
Overall
36.0
Output $/M
$1.98
7
GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 scores 54.6 and GPT-4o 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when output tokens cost 5.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
7
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
71
GPT-4o only
19
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 54.6 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4o 38.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Reasoning, 56.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 90.5% against GPT-4o 4.5%, 86.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against GPT-4o $10.00 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsGPT-4oTies
Reasoning40
General30
All shared boards70
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured38.8%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured38.0%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)Not measured18.8%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured30.4%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.9%Only GPT-4o measured
SciCode51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only GPT-4o measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1462Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1566Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured25.1%Only GPT-4o measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GDPvalNot measured9.9%Only GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%54.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%2.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%4.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI-261.3%0.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expert1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured6.0Only GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.0%Only GPT-4o measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only GPT-4o measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLUNot measured88.1%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured831Only GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured885Only GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured906Only GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured858Only GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured869Only GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured861Only GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBenchNot measured34.3%Only GPT-4o measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%49.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%64.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%16.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: English1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1454Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-4oLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-4o
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813OpenAI GPT-4o
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026May 13, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$2.50
Output $/Mtok$1.98$10.00
Coding index54.638.8
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than GPT-4o for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 scores 54.6 and GPT-4o 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when output tokens cost 5.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-4o?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; GPT-4o costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-4o?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-4o comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next