Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads Gemma 4 26B A4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 16.7, and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Replace Gemma 4 26B A4B
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
37
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
4
vs boards won of 41 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemma 4 26B A4B: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.98 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: math or LMArena Text: mathematical work, where it leads.

Model ADeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek56.1/1005 independent benchmarks$0.10 per solved taskModel BGemma 4 26B A4BGoogleNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
41
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
37
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 38.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1588 against Gemma 4 26B A4B 1351, 39.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 4 26B A4B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsGemma 4 26B A4BTies
Coding90
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning60
Math12
Knowledge40
General142
All shared boards374
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
LMArena WebDev15821360DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA Coding Index68.839.3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%40.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.0%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%35.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ALE-Bench1403.2927.2DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: coding14691446DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14621454DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: React15881351DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661362DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.016.7DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6141.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Agentic Index41.32.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured43.6%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%79.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%19.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%73.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581438DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14591447DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631448DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1264Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1293Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%82.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math14411470Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431475Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science14571446DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461428DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: legal and government14591457DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14421429DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured42.7%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index142
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBenchNot measured72.4%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%65.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%74.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%29.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text14461434DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14481420DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14391400DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena VisionNot measured1260Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: English14571444DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14311421DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14811495Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French14461460Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Spanish14351415DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Russian14481434DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541441DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14581427DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14431405DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241403DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1312Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1268Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1272Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1297Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1191Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1256Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Google Gemma 4 26B A4B
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026April 3, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.98$0.60
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.98 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: math or LMArena Text: mathematical work, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Gemma 4 26B A4B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next