Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Devstral 2 2512

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 8.6, at about the same output price ($1.98 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
5
Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Devstral 2 2512: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
73
Devstral 2 2512 only
1
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 39.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 41.3 against Devstral 2 2512 2.3, 39.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Devstral 2 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsDevstral 2 2512Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured53.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
AA Coding Index68.831.3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%51.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%62.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1462Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1566Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index36.08.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Agentic Index41.32.3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expert1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: English1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1454Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Devstral 2 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Devstral 2 2512
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Mistral Devstral 2 2512
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026December 9, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.40
Output $/Mtok$1.98$2.00
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$0.10$1.19
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Devstral 2 2512 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Devstral 2 2512?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.10 and Devstral 2 2512 $1.19.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Devstral 2 2512?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Devstral 2 2512 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Devstral 2 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next