Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs o4 Mini

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads o4 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 16.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 5.6x less per output token ($0.78 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 61 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.78
61
o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
43.0
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 61 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or o4 Mini: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o4 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
61
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
40
o4 Mini only
37
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, o4 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 44.4 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 72.9% against o4 Mini 6.1%, 66.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.78 against o4 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, o4 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarso4 MiniTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning110
Math50
Knowledge70
Web design60
General280
All shared boards610
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured72.0%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured64.6%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured33.9%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only o4 Mini measured
SciCode51.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GSO-BenchNot measured3.6%Only o4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.6%Only o4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1092.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15021368DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14961367DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured10.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.716.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9145.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured55.6%Only o4 Mini measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
METR time horizonsNot measured63.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured53.2%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured74.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only o4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%16.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%79.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI94.5%58.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI-272.9%6.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SimpleBenchNot measured38.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles48.0%22.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Mystery game puzzles43.0%5.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
VPCTNot measured57.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14831351DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15011343DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14881366DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams12971197DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework13071234DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured83.7%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.4%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%81.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%36.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%4.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14781389DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14851379DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured80.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%79.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.0%Only o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%33.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%19.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science14691354DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14841361DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14431350DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14611325DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured28.1%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1309985DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1315983DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: game dev13301003DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz1290990DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1356854DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories1320976DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index280
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%41.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%69.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
IFBenchNot measured68.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%61.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%77.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA47.0%26.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured77.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.0%Only o4 Mini measured
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text14641353DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14731320DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14371294DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision12781194DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: English14731367DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14491337DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15011354DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German14701336DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14321308DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14361312DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: French14651364DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14591346DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14671334DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14571358DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14611350DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14731315DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14501316DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14451308DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12881200DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese13271218DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text12821197DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor12601199DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1204Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12751166DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.050Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and o4 Mini
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpenAI o4 Mini
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window1.05M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.21$1.10
Output $/Mtok$0.78$4.40
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than o4 Mini for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o4 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or o4 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $0.78 per million output tokens; o4 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or o4 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs o4 Mini comparison based on?

61 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and o4 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next