Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M2.1

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 20.9, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 1.4x less per output token ($0.84 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.84
14
MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 14 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M2.1: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
14
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
87
MiniMax M2.1 only
20
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 16.3 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1330 against MiniMax M2.1 1134, 24.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.84 against MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsMiniMax M2.1Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Knowledge20
Web design70
General20
All shared boards140
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCode51.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured36.6%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1092.3623.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: coding1502Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1496Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.720.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured85.4%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%23.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1483Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1488Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1297Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1307Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
AIMENot measured77.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured82.7Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1478Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1485Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%75.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.3%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%34.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1484Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: websites13081201DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: UI components13121220DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: game dev13301134DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12911206DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: 3D13551164DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories13201190DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: SVG12451131DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%80.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
IFBenchNot measured69.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%67.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMCA47.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text1464Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1437Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1470Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1467Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1450Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1445Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1288Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1327Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1260Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1275Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.014Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.053Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M2.1
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026December 23, 2025
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$0.2225$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.84$1.20
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than MiniMax M2.1 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.2225 per million input tokens and $0.84 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M2.1 comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next