Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-4.1 Mini

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads GPT-4.1 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 10.2, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 1.9x less per output token ($0.84 vs $1.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 57 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.84
57
GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
31.9
Output $/M
$1.60
0
vs boards won of 57 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-4.1 Mini: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
57
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
44
GPT-4.1 Mini only
29
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 42.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 94.5% against GPT-4.1 Mini 3.5%, 91.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.84 against GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4.1 Mini 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsGPT-4.1 MiniTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning110
Math40
Knowledge60
Web design60
General260
All shared boards570
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured32.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured23.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.2Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured58.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SciCode51.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
WeirdMLNot measured37.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1092.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15021367DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14961360DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.710.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9134.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured52.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured50.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured67.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured70.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%5.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%65.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI94.5%3.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI-272.9%0.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Chess puzzles48.0%1.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Mystery game puzzles43.0%7.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts14831349DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15011338DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14881362DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams12971182DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework13071214DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured48.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured49.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured46.3Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%44.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%6.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured87.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14781343DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14851347DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%78.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured84.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.1%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%12.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: science14691328DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14841324DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14431343DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14611322DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1308997DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1312958DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: game dev13301070DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12911034DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1355836DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories1320993DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index260
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured38.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%44.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%68.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA47.0%21.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text14641341DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14731333DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14371299DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision12781181DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: English14731356DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14491318DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15011329DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German14701350DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14321290DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14361298DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: French14651358DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14591319DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14671324DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14571326DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14611354DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14731344DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14501319DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14451300DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12881191DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese13271186DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text12821188DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor12601182DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1174Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1187Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12751182DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.014Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.053Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-4.1 Mini
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpenAI GPT-4.1 Mini
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026April 14, 2025
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.2225$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.84$1.60
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.818
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GPT-4.1 Mini for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-4.1 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.2225 per million input tokens and $0.84 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 and $1.60. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-4.1 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-4.1 Mini comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-4.1 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next