Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 7.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 16.7x less per output token ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
8
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 8 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-4o (2024-08-06): which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
31
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
50
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 82.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 99.4% against GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 6.4%, 93.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Ties
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge10
General10
All shared boards80
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured23.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured21.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1278Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.57.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured28.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%2.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%49.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SimpleBenchNot measured17.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles46.0%6.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1264Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1241Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1277Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
AIMENot measured14.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured75.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%6.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%0.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MATH level 5Not measured53.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1285Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured74.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%26.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MMLUNot measured84.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1274Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1252Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1232Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Design Arena: websites1310Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1352Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%41.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena TextNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1267Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1274Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1065Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1297Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1262Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1254Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1257Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1234Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1218Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1263Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1269Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1272Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1279Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1290Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1267Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1009Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 6, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$10.00
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next