LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 22 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
83.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
19
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
42.8
Overall
33.6
Output $/M
$9.00
3
vs boards won of 22 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 42.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash when what matters is Finance Agent (Vals AI) or Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
22
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
10
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
88
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83.3 from 2 benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash 42.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 20.2 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 87.7% against Gemini 3.5 Flash 48.7%, 39.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGemini 3.5 FlashTies
Coding80
Intelligence10
Agentic work22
Reasoning10
Web design61
General10
All shared boards193
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641499DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%6.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%48.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%26.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured52.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode55.9%53.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
WeirdMLNot measured62.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1622.0911.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1493Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1494Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671495DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871522DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1504Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.533.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1202Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1190Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1098Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1180Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1142Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1178Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1238Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%57.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%21.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%30.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%63.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured5.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured27.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,396Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%42.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured92.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured76.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-benchNot measured4.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1488Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1504Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured66.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1488Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1467Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites13121268DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13051272DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13651263DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301236DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13681244DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13351266DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12441253Gemini 3.5 Flash
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured62.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured76.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%74.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCANot measured47.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured58.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1482Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1467Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1470Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1475Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1527Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1494Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1486Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1448Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1490Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1480Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1493Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1516Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1478Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1459Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1305Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1377Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1317Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1321Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1301Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1463Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Google Gemini 3.5 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026May 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$9.00
Coding index83.342.8
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.21
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 42.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash when what matters is Finance Agent (Vals AI) or Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 and $9.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next